欧洲新闻网 | 中国 | 国际 | 社会 | 娱乐 | 时尚 | 民生 | 科技 | 旅游 | 体育 | 财经 | 健康 | 文化 | 艺术 | 人物 | 家居 | 公益 | 视频 | 华人 | 有福之州
投稿邮箱:uscntv@outlook.com
主页 > 头条 > 正文

拜登政府批评推翻庇护政策的裁决

2023-07-27 10:00 -ABC  -  405084

拜登政府表示,联邦法官的裁决推翻了拜登政府的庇护政策这就建立了一个不符合庇护资格的“可推翻的推定”。

国土安全部部长亚历杭德罗·马约尔卡斯表示,他不同意法院的裁决。

“这并没有限制我们为非法进入承担后果的能力,”他说说。“不要相信走私者的谎言。那些没有使用我们扩大的许多合法途径之一的人将被推定为没有资格获得庇护,如果他们没有留下来的依据,将被立即驱逐出境,至少五年不得入境,并可能因非法入境而受到刑事起诉。”

该决定宣布后不久,司法部表示支持该政策。

“我们仍然相信我们的立场,即绕过合法途径规则是合法行使移民法赋予的广泛权力,”司法部发言人说。

然而,移民倡导者认为这一裁决是一次胜利。

“这一裁决是一个胜利,但拜登政府每天都在延长对其非法禁令的斗争,许多逃离迫害和为家人寻求安全庇护的人反而处于严重的危险之中,”说美国公民自由联盟移民权利项目副主任Katrina Eiland对此案进行了辩论。“美国的承诺是充当自由和希望的灯塔,政府能够也应该更好地履行这一承诺,而不是延续背叛它的残酷和无效的政策。”

就在法官乔恩·蒂加尔(Jon Tigar)周二做出阻止政府庇护限制的裁决几个小时后,司法部提出了一项动议,要求在上诉期间暂缓执行该命令,并提出了一项紧急动议,要求缩短批准暂缓执行的时间。法院踢凌空的球裁决紧急动议另一天,说司法部没有证明法院有充分的理由在原告有机会表达反对意见之前发布裁决,并给他们7月26日下午5点之前提交他们的回应。

Tigar周二晚上的裁决发现该政策“违反法律”,并下令在两周内终止该政策。

“在这一案件中,行政机关的严重错误强烈有利于瓦卡特。该规则在实质上和程序上都是无效的。行政机关不能采用同样的发回重审规则;如上所述,该规则是违反法律的,”奥巴马任命的Tigar,书写.

在……之后标题42的回滚特朗普政府在疫情的支持下驱逐边境移民的政策,拜登政府推出了新的庇护政策,限制了在南部边境提出的申请数量。

该政策在第42章于5月11日结束后生效,规定移民在到达美国之前必须在他们经过的国家申请庇护。此外,根据政府的说法,移民必须使用CBP One应用程序申请庇护,以控制边境的移民流量。它的有效期只有两年。

美国海关和边境保护局据报告的144,571次在西南边境的遭遇,标志着最低月总额2023财年。

Biden administration criticizes ruling striking down asylum policy

The Biden administration expressed a federal judge's ruling striking down the Biden administration'sasylum policythat established a "rebuttable presumption" of asylum ineligibility.

Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas said he disagreed with the court's ruling.

"It does not limit our ability to deliver consequences for unlawful entry," hesaid. "Do not believe the lies of smugglers. Those who fail to use one of the many lawful pathways we have expanded will be presumed ineligible for asylum and, if they do not have a basis to remain, will be subject to prompt removal, a minimum five-year bar on admission, and potential criminal prosecution for unlawful reentry."

Shortly after the decision was handed down, the Justice Department said it stood by the policy.

"We remain confident in our position that the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways rule is a lawful exercise of the broad authority granted by the immigration laws," a spokesperson for the Justice Department said.

PHOTO: Immigrants, most from Venezuela, are escorted by Mexican immigration agents after being expelled from the United States on Jan. 9, 2023 in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.

Immigrants, most from Venezuela, are escorted by Mexican immigration agents after being expelled from the United States on Jan. 9, 2023 in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.

John Moore/Getty Images, FILE

Immigration advocates, however, see the ruling as a victory.

"The ruling is a victory, but each day the Biden administration prolongs the fight over its illegal ban, many people fleeing persecution and seeking safe harbor for their families are instead left in grave danger,"saidKatrina Eiland, deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, who argued the case. "The promise of America is to serve as a beacon of freedom and hope, and the administration can and should do better to fulfill this promise, rather than perpetuate cruel and ineffective policies that betray it."

Just hours after Judge Jon Tigar's ruling on Tuesday blocking the administration's asylum restrictions, the Justice Department filed a motion to stay the order pending appeal and an emergency motion to shorten the time to grant that stay. The courtpuntedruling on the emergency motion for another day, saying that the Justice Department did not demonstrate good cause for the court to issue a ruling before the plaintiffs had the chance to voice their opposition and gave them until July 26 at 5 pm to file their response.

Tigar's Tuesday night ruling found the policy to be "contrary to law" and ordered the policy be ended in two weeks.

"The severity of the agencies' errors in this case counsels strongly in favor of vacatur. The Rule is both substantively and procedurally invalid. The agencies cannot adopt the same rule on remand; as described above, the Rule is contrary to law," Tigar, an Obama appointee,wrote.

In the wake of therollback of Title 42, the Trump administration policy which expelled migrants along the border under the auspices of the pandemic, the Biden administration rolled out a new asylum policy which limited the number of claims that were made at the southern border.

The policy, which took effect after Title 42 ended on May 11, mandated that migrants apply for asylum in the counties that they passed through before reaching the United States. Additionally, migrants would have to use the CBP One App to apply for asylum to control the flow of migrants at the border, according to the administration. It would be in effect for only two years.

U.S. Customs and Border Protectionreported144,571 encounters at the southwest land border in the month of June, marking thelowest monthly totalin fiscal year 2023.

  声明:文章大多转自网络,旨在更广泛的传播。本文仅代表作者个人观点,与美国新闻网无关。其原创性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,对本文以及其中全部或者部分内容、文字的真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。如有稿件内容、版权等问题请联系删除。联系邮箱:uscntv@outlook.com。

上一篇:拜登弹劾调查正在讨论中,在某个时候
下一篇:拜登政府取消了被科罗拉多学院“敲诈”的学生的1.3亿美元债务

热点新闻

重要通知

服务之窗

关于我们| 联系我们| 广告服务| 供稿服务| 法律声明| 招聘信息| 网站地图

本网站所刊载信息,不代表美国新闻网的立场和观点。 刊用本网站稿件,务经书面授权。

美国新闻网由欧洲华文电视台美国站主办 www.uscntv.com

[部分稿件来源于网络,如有侵权请及时联系我们] [邮箱:uscntv@outlook.com]