该消息人士称，卢比奥领导下的国务院官员从未推动旨在获得格陵兰岛的政策，哥本哈根对2025年大部分时间的双边关系感到满意。
丹麦首相敦促特朗普“停止吞并格陵兰的威胁”
2026年1月14日，在丹麦哥本哈根的美国大使馆外，抗议者举行了题为“格陵兰属于格陵兰人”的抗议活动。
消息人士称，这种情况在12月发生了变化，当时特朗普任命路易斯安那州共和党州长杰夫·兰德里(Jeff Landry)为他的格陵兰特使，此举旨在从白宫而不是通过国务院引导政策。
流行读物北卡罗来纳州警方继续寻找在拨打911求救电话后失踪的母亲1月14日下午6点13分
伊朗抗议:特朗普说他已经被告知“杀戮”停止，不会执行死刑
去年3月去过格陵兰岛的万斯上周四说，“我想我给欧洲领导人和其他人的建议是，认真对待美国总统。”特朗普下令美国军队袭击委内瑞拉几天后，他发表了一些希望格陵兰成为美国一部分的言论，此后，华盛顿的丹麦和格陵兰官员前往国会山向立法者表达了担忧。这张资料照片显示的是2025年3月28日，美国副总统万斯(JD Vance)参观格陵兰岛的美军皮图菲克航天基地。吉姆·沃森/路透社一位熟悉这些会议的消息人士表示，共和党人的语气发生了转变，他们表示认真对待总统的威胁，而不是开玩笑。参议院军事委员会的最高共和党人在与丹麦特使的会面中排除了任何关于格陵兰岛的未来存在争议的暗示。“我认为，我们的丹麦朋友和格陵兰朋友已经明确表示，未来不包括谈判，”罗杰·威克说。与此同时，一个由美国两党议员组成的小组正在横渡大西洋，参加本周末在哥本哈根举行的会议。北极安全是一个中心论点特朗普曾表示，美国出于国家安全目的将要求对该岛拥有主权，这表明中国和俄罗斯可能会通过占领该岛对美国构成威胁。“基本上，他们的防御就是两辆狗拉雪橇，”特朗普谈到格陵兰岛时说，美国在那里有一个军事基地和150名驻军。“与此同时，俄罗斯的驱逐舰和潜艇以及中国的驱逐舰和潜艇随处可见。”丹麦官员已经指出了对该岛的新投资，以及与北约和美国合作保护该岛的意愿。该王国去年宣布了一项65亿美元的北极防御计划。
丹麦负责防务的最高立法者表示，对该岛的威胁并非来自东部，而是来自大西洋彼岸的北约盟友美国。“负责格陵兰岛的安全是我的工作，我得到了所有相关信息，”拉斯穆斯·贾洛夫在x上的一篇帖子中写道，“我可以向你保证，你关于中国和俄罗斯对格陵兰岛构成巨大威胁的幻想是妄想。他在谈到美国时写道，“你们才是威胁，而不是他们。”2025年9月17日，丹麦军队参加格陵兰岛Kangerlussuaq的军事演习。guglielmo Mangiapane/路透社康纳·麦克帕特兰(Connor McPartland)说，与格陵兰岛相比，中国和俄罗斯的挑衅更集中在阿拉斯加附近。他指出，中国在该岛的商业利益很小，俄罗斯或中国海军在该岛附近的活动没有增加。直到9月份一直担任五角大楼北极和全球安全办公室副主任的麦克帕特兰表示，特朗普对北极安全的关注是对一个被忽视地区的必要关注。
“关心北极不仅仅是关心北极，”他说。“它对我们的全球安全产生了影响，而不仅仅是在世界之巅的这一小块地方。”
一位熟悉正在出现的分歧的消息人士说，政策声明令人震惊，美国购买岛屿的目标从未传达给哥本哈根，该消息人士说，哥本哈根从未收到任何形式的要约。
“在我的办公室里，我们想说北极是国土的前门，因为我们认为对美国的大多数真正存在的威胁(如核导弹)将飞越北极到达美国大陆，”麦克帕特兰说，他现在是大西洋理事会跨大西洋安全倡议的助理主任。
“这是从俄罗斯、朝鲜、伊朗和中国到达美国的最快方式。”
一位熟悉正在出现的分歧的消息人士说，政策声明令人震惊，美国购买岛屿的目标从未传达给哥本哈根，该消息人士说，哥本哈根从未收到任何形式的要约。
“美国控制格陵兰并没有真正需要解决的问题，”麦克帕特兰说。“我们可以建设基础设施，我们可以驻扎军队，我们可以几乎随心所欲地从格陵兰岛开展行动，只要我们承认丹麦和格陵兰岛的主权。”
格陵兰Taboola赞助的内容美国从下周开始暂停75个国家的签证办理发现2026年金球奖:詹妮弗·劳伦斯穿着绣有花卉图案的透明礼服汽车小说发现17种绝对不能放入冰箱的食物阅读更多跳跃美国如何接管格陵兰和潜在的挑战官员称，飞机失事数周后，纳斯卡车手格雷格·比夫勒在北卡罗来纳州的家被盗获取从课堂到职业的支持。找到你的王冠。
什么是无螺钉种植牙，它们的价格是多少?
无螺钉牙种植体
现在免费玩战争雷霆
加入新的免费玩二战MMO战争雷霆
预制房屋:环保生活的当代选择
给你的消息
2026格莱美奖:看谁被提名
金球奖2026:查看完整的提名名单
1月11日凌晨1点31分
伊朗警告美国军队，如果美国袭击抗议活动，以色列将成为目标
1月11日下午1点53分
前夫因涉嫌俄亥俄州牙医妻子双重谋杀被捕
1月11日，早上7:06
Trump again says 'we need Greenland' after Danish officials outline 'fundamental disagreement'
President Donald Trump again stressed his aim of acquiring Greenland on Wednesday shortly after top Danish officials met with Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House.
Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen told reporters the discussion was "frank and constructive" but that "fundamental disagreements" remained as Trump's intentions were communicated bluntly.
"It's clear that the president has this wish of conquering over Greenland," he said. Rasmussen called that outcome "totally unacceptable."
According to Rasmussen, a high-level working group has been created "to explore if we can find a common way forward." He said he expected the group will meet for the first time in a matter of weeks.
"The group, in our view, should focus on how to address the American security concerns while at the same time respecting theredlines of the Kingdom of Denmark," Rasmussen said alongside Greenland's Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt.
Trump, taking reporter questions in the Oval Office later Wednesday afternoon, said he would be briefed on the meeting between Vance, Rubio and Danish officials. He said he believed "something will work out."
"We're going to see what happens. We need Greenland for national security," Trump said.
"We havea very goodrelationship with Denmark, as you know.We'llsee. But, you know,we'redoing the Golden Dome.We'redoing a lot of things. And we reallyneed it," Trump said. Trumpearlier this year unveiled plansfor a $175 billion U.S. missile defense shield similar to Israel’s Iron Dome.
"If wedon'tgo in, Russia's going to goin and China is going to go in. Andthere'sanother thing that Denmark can do about it, but we can do everything about it," Trump added.
Denmark's Rasmussen said he pushed back on such comments from Trump during Wednesday's White House meeting, which he said was focused heavily on security.
"I think that is a necessity if we want to have a proper debate," Rasmussen said. The Danish foreign minister told reporters there's not an "instant threat from China and Russia -- at least not a threat we can't accommodate.”
Meanwhile, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has argued Trump using the U.S. military to seize Greenland would mark "the end of NATO" because Denmark, a NATO ally, like the U.S., is obligated to come to the island's defense, as are other European NATO allies.
The European Union’s defense commissioner, Andrius Kubilius, echoed her grave hypothetical scenario, contending Europe would be forced to confront the U.S. if Greenland's NATO allies had to protect it from an American takeover attempt.
Trump was pressed by a reporter on whether he would leave the NATO alliance in order to acquire Greenland.
"Iwouldn'tbe telling you whatI'mwilling to do.Certainly,I'mnot going to give upoptions, butit'svery important. Greenland isvery importantfor the national security, including of Denmark," Trump said.
Danes shocked by US rhetoric toward Greenland
Danish and Greenlandic officials have said consistently that Greenland is not for sale, even as Rubio appeared to try to temper Trump's strong rhetoric -- and defuse congressional opposition to using force -- by floating the idea of the U.S. buying the island, saying Trump has talked about doing so since his first term.
A source familiar with the emerging rift said the policy pronouncement came as a shock, and that the U.S. goal to buy the island was never communicated to Copenhagen -- which the source said had never received an offer of any kind.
State Department officials under Rubio had never driven a Greenland policy aimed at acquiring it, the source said, and Copenhagen had been satisfied with bilateral relations through most of 2025.
That changed in December, when Trump appointed Louisiana GOP Gov. Jeff Landry to be his special envoy to Greenland, a move designed to steer policy from the White House instead of through the State Department, the source said.
Vance, who traveled to Greenland last March, said last Thursday, "I guess my advice to European leaders and anybody else would be to take the president of the United States seriously."
Following some of Trump’s comments that he wanted Greenland to be part of the U.S., which came days after he ordered the American military to attack Venezuela, Danish and Greenlandic officials in Washington went to Capitol Hill to voice concerns to lawmakers.
A source familiar with those meetings said there was a tone shift among Republicans, who said they took the president’s threats seriously – not as a laughing matter.
The top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee emerged from his meeting with the Danish envoys foreclosing any suggestion the future of Greenland was in dispute.
"I think it has been made clear from our Danish friends and our friends in Greenland that that future does not include a negotiation," Sen. Roger Wicker said.
Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of American lawmakers was crossing the Atlantic for meetings in Copenhagen at the end of this week.
Arctic security as a central argument
Trump has said the U.S. would demand sovereignty over the island for its own national security purposes, suggesting China and Russia could pose a threat to America by taking the island themselves.
"Basically, their defense is two dog sleds," Trump said of Greenland, where the U.S. has a military base and 150 troops stationed. "In the meantime, you have Russian destroyers and submarines and China destroyers and submarines all over the place."
Danish officials have pointed to new investments there and a willingness to work with NATO and the U.S. on protecting the island. The kingdom announced a $6.5 billion Arctic defense package last year.
Denmark’s top lawmaker overseeing defense said the threat to the island did not come from the east, but instead from the U.S., its NATO ally across the Atlantic.
"It is my job to be on top of security in Greenland and I get all relevant information about it," Rasmus Jarlov wrote in a post on X. "I can assure you that your fantasies about a big threat from China and Russia against Greenland are delusional. You are the threat,” he wrote of the U.S. "Not them."
Provocations from China and Russia have been more concentrated near Alaska than Greenland, said Connor McPartland, who noted China has minimal commercial interests on the island and there’s been no uptick in Russian or Chinese naval activity near the island.
McPartland, who was the deputy director of the Pentagon’s Office for Arctic and Global Security until September, said Trump’s attention to Arctic security comes as a needed focus on an overlooked region.
"Caring about the Arctic is not just caring about the Arctic,” he said. "It has ramifications for our global security, not just in this one little sliver of at the top of the world."
"In my office, we'd like to say that the Arctic is the front door to the homeland, because most of the really existential threats to the United States that we think about [like a] nuclear missile … are going to fly over the pole to get to the continental United States,” said McPartland, who is now an an assistant director with the Atlantic Council’s Transatlantic Security Initiative.
"It's the fastest way to get to the United States, from Russia, from North Korea, from Iran, from China."
A 1951 treaty between the U.S. and Greenland allows the American military, which has downsized its presence to only one base in Greenland, to upscale its footprint as it wants. During the Cold War, the U.S. had 17 military installations there.
"There aren't really problems to be solved by the United States controlling Greenland," said McPartland. "We can build infrastructure, we can station troops, we can operate from Greenland almost at will, as long as we recognize the sovereignty of Denmark and Greenland."
