欧洲新闻网 | 中国 | 国际 | 社会 | 娱乐 | 时尚 | 民生 | 科技 | 旅游 | 体育 | 财经 | 健康 | 文化 | 艺术 | 人物 | 家居 | 公益 | 视频 | 华人 | 有福之州
投稿邮箱:uscntv@outlook.com
主页 > 头条 > 正文

最高法院拒绝阻止伊利诺伊州的攻击性武器禁令

2023-05-18 10:24 -ABC  -  405148

美国最高法院周三拒绝阻止伊利诺伊州的攻击性武器禁令随着法律挑战的继续,美国正在努力应对大规模枪击和枪支暴力的激增,枪支安全倡导者取得了胜利。

单页订单没有明显的异议。

2022年高地公园枪击案发生后,一名持枪者手持AR-15和30发子弹,造成7人死亡,48人受伤,该州和几个城市颁布了新的限制措施,禁止销售、购买、制造、交付或进口突击式枪支和大容量弹匣。

这些法律立即引起了该州枪支拥有者和枪支商店的法律质疑。

PHOTO: FILE - The U.S. Supreme Court building, Jan. 26, 2022 in Washington, DC.

2022年1月26日,DC华盛顿州,美国最高法院大楼。

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images,文件

与此同时,下级法院拒绝阻止该法律的实施。该案件将在未来几个月由第七巡回上诉法院审理。

枪支权利倡导者表示,他们的案件“极其简单”,伊利诺伊州的法律违反了最高法院去年在纽约州步枪和手枪协会诉布鲁恩案中规定的标准下的第二修正案。他们说,原告希望保持和携带武器的合法目的-保卫自己的家园-并没有建国时代的先例,以禁止整个类别的武器。

该州称其法律是否违宪还远未明朗。他们认为,在该法律颁布之前拥有攻击性武器的枪支所有者可以继续合法持有,但必须向州警方提交一份宣誓书,证明之前的购买行为。

Supreme Court declines to block Illinois' assault weapons ban

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday has declined to blockIllinois' assault weapons banfrom being enforced as a legal challenge continues, handing a win to gun safety advocates at a time when the nation is grappling with a surge of mass shootings and gun violence.

The single page order had no noted dissents.

After the 2022 Highland Park shooting, in which a gunman armed with an AR-15 and 30-round magazines killed seven people and wounded 48, the state and several cities enacted new restrictions against the sale, purchase, manufacture, delivery or importation of assault-style firearms and high-capacity magazines.

The laws immediately drew a legal challenge from gun owners and gun shops in the state.

Lower courts had declined to block enforcement of the law in the meantime. The case is set to be heard by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the coming months.

The gun rights advocates say theirs is an "exceedingly simple case" and that the Illinois laws violate the Second Amendment under the Supreme Court's standard set forth last year in New York State Rifle and Pistol Assn v. Bruen. They say the plaintiffs want to keep and bear arms for a lawful purpose -- defense of their home -- and that there is no founding era precedent to ban an entire category of arms.

The state says it's far from clear that its laws are unconstitutional. They argue that gun owners who possessed assault weapons prior to the law can continue to do so lawfully, but must submit an affidavit to State Police attesting to prior purchase.

  声明:文章大多转自网络,旨在更广泛的传播。本文仅代表作者个人观点,与美国新闻网无关。其原创性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,对本文以及其中全部或者部分内容、文字的真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。如有稿件内容、版权等问题请联系删除。联系邮箱:uscntv@outlook.com。

上一篇:国务院态度缓和,将允许国会审查阿富汗“异议电缆”
下一篇:为什么民主党人吹捧杰克逊维尔市长的胜利是对德桑蒂斯剧本的指责

热点新闻

重要通知

服务之窗

关于我们| 联系我们| 广告服务| 供稿服务| 法律声明| 招聘信息| 网站地图

本网站所刊载信息,不代表美国新闻网的立场和观点。 刊用本网站稿件,务经书面授权。

美国新闻网由欧洲华文电视台美国站主办 www.uscntv.com

[部分稿件来源于网络,如有侵权请及时联系我们] [邮箱:uscntv@outlook.com]