周五，联邦法官宣布唐纳德·特朗普总统拒绝庇护任何从指定入境口岸入境的移民的计划无效，这是过去一周针对这一有争议政策的第二次裁决。
美国地方法官伦道夫·莫斯(Randolph Moss)裁定，该政策“不符合移民和国籍法”，因此无法实施。1952年的法案包含了美国移民法中一些最重要的条款。
莫斯在他长达77页的裁决中写道:“这条规则违反法律，因此必须被搁置。”。
特朗普在2018年11月的公告中发布了移民政策，该政策将限制在合法入境口岸入境的移民申请庇护的数量。总统当时告诉记者，“我们希望人们进入我们的国家，但是他们必须合法进入这个国家。”
周五的决定是一周内联邦法院第二次否决庇护政策。
7月24日，旧金山的一名法官在发现政府对越来越多的越境事件感到沮丧并不能证明修改法律是正当的后，暂时阻止了新的移民规定。
美国地方法官乔恩·蒂加尔宣布了这一裁决，他引用了大量证据，证明移民不能安全地在墨西哥等待庇护，而不能越过边境进入美国。他补充称，特朗普政府试图“捷径”法律并不是解决问题的办法。
特朗普政府已经在第九巡回上诉法院对蒂加尔法官的决定提出上诉。总统也可能试图对莫斯法官周五的裁决提出上诉。
庇护政策是特朗普政府打击合法和非法移民的一部分。白宫认为，大部分来自拉丁美洲的移民一直在通过虚假的庇护申请来玩游戏，但这些申请大多没有得到证实。
最近，特朗普政府宣布与危地马拉和墨西哥等外国签署新的移民协议，要求庇护申请人在来美国之前首先在本国寻求安全
司法部长威廉·巴尔(William Barr)也发布了一项裁决，将严重限制寻求庇护的人数。这项措施使得移民更难声称他们需要保护，因为他们的家庭成员面临威胁。
特朗普周四晚上在俄亥俄州举行的2020年集会上谈到了移民问题。在他的演讲中，总统批评美国的移民系统“完全崩溃”，并发誓如果共和党在2020年赢得众议院、参议院和总统职位，就要修复它。在特朗普担任总统的头两年，共和党控制了这三个分支，但仍未能颁布移民政策。
特朗普说:“我们将实行择优移民制度。”。“择优录取。择优移民，我们需要这一点，因为我们有来自世界各地的公司，我们需要优秀的工人，我们需要优秀的人才。”
TRUMP'S PLAN TO DENY ASYLUM TO MIGRANTS WHO ENTER U.S. OUTSIDE PORTS OF ENTRY STRUCK DOWN BY FEDERAL JUDGE — AGAIN
President Donald Trump's plan to deny asylum to any migrant who enters the country outside of a designated port of entry was invalidated by a federal judge on Friday, marking the second ruling against the controversial policy in the past week.
U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled that the policy is "inconsistent" with the Immigration and Nationality Act and therefore cannot be put into effect. The 1952 act contains some of the most important provisions of U.S. immigration law.
"The Rule is contrary to law and must, as a result, be set aside," Moss wrote in his 77-page ruling.
The immigration policy, which would limit the amount of asylum claims to migrants who enter the country at legal ports of entry, was issued by Trump in a proclamation in November 2018. The president told reporters at the time that "we want people to come into our country, but they have to come into the country legally."
Friday's decision was the second time in under a week that a federal court has ruled against the asylum policy.
On July 24, a judge in San Francisco temporarily blocked the new immigration rule after finding that the government's frustration with the increasing amount of border crossings didn't justify changing the law.
U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar handed down the ruling, citing a "mountain" of evidence that migrants could not safely wait for asylum in Mexico instead of crossing over to the U.S. side of the border. He added that the Trump administration's attempt to" shortcut" the law was not the solution to the problem.